divisions
Above (top left): Post Revolution boundaries of the greater Great Knot heritage region when the Commons were divided into Classes and Lots

Left: The natural form of the land as a relief map has the lots of the 1803 division of the Kingston Commons laid over it to show how the land directed their placement.

Land as a Temporal Contrivance


A survey of Will Cockburn for the Trustees of the Corporation of Kingston showing the claim of the Kingston patent with references to all property exclusions overlapping it in the area of Saugerties.

After a century and a half of honoring the Native American's respect for the nobility of the land; the prototype of the highest form of "community"; the "Commonality" of Kingston relented to the post Revolution functionality of individual ownership of the land. The process they followed in executing this applied the Classes and Files found in the scientific methodology of the times... the same order embodied in the form of the knot.

This statement of organization as the rationale for a process of identification begs the question of why any code, or method of encrypted communication, innately rational in its time, ends in obscurity; lost in the mists of time. This question is most prescient, as it gives the Great Knot its site specific purpose.

The land and its heritage is part of the Great Knot. As it absorbs the many forgotten facets of the cultural environment it remediates the spirit of the land. It reclaims this along with the material from which it is built to restore pride to the land.

The relationship of the Great Knot to this heritage originates in a reference coded into the boundary description of the Town of Saugerties and recorded with its incorporation to assure that the identity and location of components of the division of the Kingston Commons survived into the future. Today few are aware of the meaning of this two hundred year old record's archaic reference, even though nearly every title to the possession of land began with it.

The monumental presence of the Great Knot is built precisely upon the temporal boundary of the Southwest Class. For hundreds of years traffic has been directed past this landmark; the waterfall of the Great Knot; that had long been a symbol of passage.

That waterfall's location is specific. Locations of property boundaries everywhere are relative to where this ancient road has never varied from the side of this waterfall. Rarely has there been a location as pivotal to such a range of site specific aspects over recorded time and the Great Knot emphasizes that.

The maps created for this web site have a cryptic function in this systemic art that the Great Knot acts as a ket to. They integrate the concept of the provenance of the divisions of the land into the concept of the art. The systemic art interprets actual places as temporal parallels to those more transcendental in the knot. The underlying land form has a metaphysical character something like the grid on which the knot relies, so long unnoticed beneath a blanket of possessiveness.



The Great Knot, April 27, 2011


Michael Sullivan Smith, 2015
Click on animation to open parent web site greatknot.com in new browser window

This is a portrait of the earth bound in a net of systemic contrivances; classifications of possession that man impresses upon nature and landform. The poetic descriptives that this land inspired; the bounty of the earth; is made into hundreds of freehold bounties as the ethic of the Commons yielded to an identity with ownership of the land.

Land forms are turned into power resources, transportation networks, and extraction opportunities. The appreciation and pleasure in the land's presence becomes a violation of privacy; the land conforms to man's hubris.